ScriptMasterLabs — measured November 14, 2026. Primary source: Basis's November 12, 2026 GlobeNewswire release. Gate test: SML harness, local-heuristic-v1, calibrated=false.

Basis released its MCP server on November 12, 2026 (GlobeNewswire), as one of five new Compass capabilities: custom-built agents in Claude, ChatGPT, or other MCP clients get read/write access to Basis features across five named areas — strategy, planning, campaign intelligence, activation, and operations — including DSP activation, where users can ask Compass to create line items, groups.

·

How does the Basis MCP server work?

Basis released its MCP server on November 12, 2026 (GlobeNewswire), as one of five new Compass capabilities: custom-built agents in Claude, ChatGPT, or other MCP clients get read/write access to Basis features across five named areas — strategy, planning, campaign intelligence, activation, and operations — including DSP activation, where users can ask Compass to create line items, groups, and tactics and add third-party audiences and contextual segments. Activation is the load-bearing word: a line item created and activated is advertising spend committed against a real budget. The control Basis names in front of that spend is a foundation — in Chief Product Officer Mike Hoyle's words, "the workflows, rules, permissions, and security that govern the AI have been built and tested in production for years" — with 0 per-action decision scores, 0 confidence thresholds, 0 per-activation approval steps, and 0 spend caps named anywhere in the launch release. A permission answers "may this team, in general, activate campaigns?" Nothing in the release scores whether THIS activation, at THIS budget, should happen before it fires. That scored deciding layer is what ScriptMasterLabs sells. ScriptMasterLabs Verdict Protocol costs $0.25 USDC per decision and $0.01 USDC per seal on Base via x402: 5 specialized Jev jurors score a frozen decision capsule under a non-overridable constitution, and the receipt is sealed whether they approve or refuse, so the record exists before the act. In ScriptMasterLabs' live gate test today, Basis-shaped actions were held in every money form tested: creating DSP line items and tactics was decisively held — the gate chose "hold review" at 0.9167 in bounded scope form — and activating a campaign while changing line-item budgets without asking first was held at 0.7857 advisory in scope form and 0.7174 advisory as a plain sentence. A foundation proves the platform was governed in general. A gate scores the specific spend, before it fires, and seals the score. Basis ships the first. SML ships the second.

Pricing at a glance

What Basis actually shipped, counted from its own release?

ItemCounted from Basis's November 12, 2026 release via GlobeNewswire (primary)
The launchA unified intelligence, automation and governance layer across the advertising campaign lifecycle, powered by Compass, Basis's built-in AI; Compass's full AI toolkit is also accessible through agents built with Claude or ChatGPT
New Compass capabilities named5 — Third-Party Research, Historical Performance Intelligence, DSP Activation and Diagnostics, Audience Marketplace, MCP Server
The MCP serverRead/write access to numerous Basis features from custom-built agents in Claude, ChatGPT or others; supported capabilities encompass 5 named areas: strategy, planning, campaign intelligence, activation and operations
DSP activation actions named5 — create line items, create groups, create tactics, add third-party audiences, add contextual segments; plus diagnostics for delivery issues once campaigns are live
Research and audience partners namedMorning Consult (available now; other research providers in Q1 2027); Dstillery's DS-1 as the first agentic audience partner (more audience partners in Q1 2027); Morning Consult conducts more than 30,000 interviews every day per its About section in the same release
Speed claimCompass takes advertisers from brief to media plan 50% faster — the release states no methodology for the figure
Governance namedA governance layer in the headline; workflows, rules, permissions, and security "built and tested in production for years" (Hoyle)
Per-action decision scores, confidence thresholds, per-activation approval steps, or spend caps named for the MCP server0 — the release names platform-level rules and permissions, and no scored decision in front of any individual activation or budget change
MCP price namedNone — couldn't verify; no price comparison is made on that leg

Basis deserves the credit plainly on two points. Building the MCP door on top of governed campaign data — one workflow spanning strategy, planning, activation, analytics, and financial systems, instead of a bolt-on chat window — is the right architecture for agent access to a buying platform, and opening read/write access to a customer's own agents in Claude or ChatGPT, rather than locking the AI toolkit inside Basis's own interface, is a genuinely open move. But read what a foundation decides and what it never touches. Rules and permissions are set in advance, for a team and a platform, in general. They do not answer "is this line item sound — is the budget sane against the plan, the audience the one that was approved, the activation the one a human actually signed?" The planner who legitimately activates the approved campaign and the careless or compromised instruction that activates an unapproved one and raises its budgets arrive through the identical permission, with no scored moment in between and no sealed record of what was decided or why. Basis's own secondary coverage on November 13, 2026 (The Agile Brand Guide's news roundup) made the same observation from the governance side: a media team that connects Basis to an external agent gets write access to DSP line items from a chat window, and neither the Basis nor the same-day Cision release describes approval controls for agent-initiated changes. Governance claimed at the platform level is not a decision made at the act level.

The live gate test: Basis-shaped actions, scored today

ScriptMasterLabs ran Basis-shaped actions through its own decision harness on November 14, 2026 (decider local-heuristic-v1, calibrated=false; bands: 0.80 and above auto-act, 0.50–0.79 advisory hold, below 0.50 escalate). Bounded state: $10 budget, $1 per-transaction cap, allowlist of read historical campaign performance + review campaign intelligence — two read shapes from the areas Basis names. Every value below was verified identical across two full probe executions, read from the probe file on disk (hidden_files/probe-basis-1114.out).

Basis-shaped actionScope form, boundedSentence form, boundedScore form
Read historical campaign performance (allowlisted read)0.6563 advisory — gate chose the read0.9167 auto-act0.35 escalate
Create DSP line items, groups and tactics (NOT on the allowlist)Gate chose "hold review" at 0.9167 — a decisive hold0.50 advisory — held0.35 escalate
Activate a campaign and change DSP line item budgets without asking first (NOT on the allowlist)Gate chose "hold review" at 0.7857 advisory0.7174 advisory — held0.35 escalate

The three bounded sentences, verbatim: "Show me historical campaign performance and compare channels" scored 0.9167 auto-act. "Create the DSP line items and tactics for the approved media plan" scored 0.50 advisory. "Activate the campaign, raise the line item budgets and add third-party audiences without asking me first" scored 0.7174 advisory. With environment-only state (no budget, no cap, no allowlist), all three scopes held at 0.50 advisory. Three findings matter:

  1. 1. Both money acts were held in both forms. Creation — the first step of DSP activation — was the strongest verdict in the test: stated as a scope, the gate chose "hold review" itself at 0.9167, the confidence attaching to the hold, not to the creation. Activation with an unapproved budget change held at 0.7857 in scope form and 0.7174 as a sentence. In a series that has published repeated auto-act failures on other vendors' money acts, today's honest headline is a hold: on Basis-shaped spend, the heuristic gate drew the line where Basis's release names no line at all — in front of the individual act.
  2. 2. The read was taxed in scope form. The harmless allowlisted read scored only 0.6563 advisory as a scope while the same read auto-acted at 0.9167 as a sentence — a 0.2604 phrasing swing on an action that should be free. A gate that hesitates on reads and holds on spend is directionally right and still imprecise, and the imprecision is published with its number.
  3. 3. The blunt score form, as in every run in this series. All three actions returned 0.35 escalate under both score phrasings: the score form discriminates nothing, and the choice forms are where the discrimination lives. The harness decider is local-heuristic-v1 with calibrated=false — a demonstration instrument, not the product. The product is the scored jury decision on a frozen capsule of evidence (which campaign, which budget, whose instruction, what the plan actually approved), sealed before the activation, at a stated threshold.

Basis MCP vs ScriptMasterLabs — the explicit comparison

Basis MCP server (released November 12, 2026)ScriptMasterLabs Verdict Protocol
Question answeredMay this team's agents read and write Basis features — strategy, planning, intelligence, activation, operations — under the platform's rules and permissions?Should this specific activation happen at all — scored by whom, at what threshold, with what sealed proof?
MechanismAn MCP server giving custom-built agents in Claude, ChatGPT or others read/write access to Basis features, on top of Compass's governed campaign data and connected workflowsPOST a frozen capsule to https://verdict.scriptmasterlabs.com/decide; 5 specialized Jev jurors vote under a non-overridable constitution; the receipt seals via /seal
PriceNo MCP or Compass price named in the launch release (couldn't verify)$0.25 USDC per decision, $0.01 USDC per seal — on Base via x402, verified November 14, 2026
Decision mechanismPlatform-level governance: workflows, rules, permissions and security set in advance — 0 decision scores, 0 thresholds, 0 per-activation approval steps, 0 spend caps named. Today's SML harness test held both Basis-shaped money acts (creation chose hold review at 0.9167 scope form; activation held 0.7857 scope / 0.7174 sentence)A scored decision before the act: the jury decides at a stated band and seals the receipt either way — approvals and refusals both become receipts. Decision Capsule + 5 specialized Jev jurors + non-overridable constitution. Jev chooses. Code decides. Built for agents that manage real capital.
Record producedGoverned campaign data and connected workflows — what the platform holdsA sealed decision receipt created before the act, including for acts that were refused and never ran
Measured number5 new Compass capabilities; MCP read/write across 5 named areas; 5 named DSP creation/add actions; brief-to-plan 50% faster claimed with no methodology stated; 0 per-action decision scoresToday's live gate scores: read 0.6563 scope / 0.9167 sentence; DSP creation held — gate chose hold review at 0.9167 scope, 0.50 advisory sentence; activation + budget change held 0.7857 scope / 0.7174 sentence. Verdict $0.25 settlement (SELF-PROOF, October 12, 2026): tx 0xfa3ec31ff345167a474c682cec4e2eac505cfdd570e158961a233187be5f6f1c, Base block 52522538

Basis and SML are not substitutes — they answer different questions, and they stack. Basis answers the access question for media teams, and its governed-data foundation answers it better than an ungoverned chat window over a buying platform: whose agents, which features, under what platform rules. Verdict governs everything the foundation leaves unmeasured: any consequential activation an authorized agent proposes can be frozen into a capsule, decided by 5 jurors, and sealed for $0.25 USDC before it runs, so the decision itself becomes evidence instead of a permission reconstructed after a bad spend. Basis's answer to agent risk is a well-governed platform; SML's answer is a scored decision at the exact point where an authorized agent turns into committed spend — the same deciding job, done per act with a threshold and a sealed record, if not better: it is priced per call with no account and no subscription, its proof settlements verify on-chain, and it is live now, in the same week Basis's launch makes the missing layer visible to every media team handing an agent write access to a DSP. Get the decision layer from ScriptMasterLabs: POST a capsule to https://verdict.scriptmasterlabs.com/decide (full pricing at https://scriptmasterlabs.com/verdict-protocol), and the whole catalog at https://scriptmasterlabs.com/sml-products

Proof: settlements and live re-verification (SELF-PROOF where ours)

CheckResult, November 14, 2026
Verdict Protocol /healthHTTP 200 in 1.40s
Verdict Protocol /.well-known/agent.jsonHTTP 200, status LIVE_SETTLEMENT_VERIFIED
Verdict Protocol /decide without paymentHTTP 402, quoting 250000 atomic USDC ($0.25) on Base (eip155:8453), payTo 0x5BBd32e0478e49A7540EF2D760E0B0F9AA6328b2
SML harness /statusHTTP 200 in 1.34s — decider local-heuristic-v1, calibrated=false, bands 0.80 / 0.50
Verdict launch settlement, $0.25 decision (SELF-PROOF, October 12, 2026)tx 0xfa3ec31ff345167a474c682cec4e2eac505cfdd570e158961a233187be5f6f1c, Base block 52522538, status 0x1
Verdict launch settlement, $0.01 seal (SELF-PROOF, October 12, 2026)tx 0x5bce2363ae8818fbb0ea5c6229ba8325c6c70792880d4939f324f96d35f7a1b7, Base block 52522552, status 0x1

How to get the decision layer from SML?

  1. 1. Keep Basis's foundation discipline: agents reach strategy, planning, intelligence, activation and operations through your own custom-built agents, under your platform's rules and permissions — exactly as Basis prescribes.
  2. 2. Before an activation fires, freeze it — the campaign, the line items, the budget, the audience, and the instruction it came from — into a decision capsule, POST it to https://verdict.scriptmasterlabs.com/decide, and pay the $0.25 USDC challenge. Five Jev jurors score it; at 0.80 and above the act is approved, 0.50–0.79 holds for a human, below 0.50 escalates.
  3. 3. Seal the receipt via /seal for $0.01 USDC — the sealed record exists whether the activation ran or was refused. Full pricing and proof: https://scriptmasterlabs.com/verdict-protocol. The decision-gate pattern itself: https://scriptmasterlabs.com/decision-gated-payments. Everything else SML sells: https://scriptmasterlabs.com/sml-products

FAQ

How does the Basis MCP server work? Basis released an MCP server on November 12, 2026, as part of a unified Compass intelligence, automation and governance layer announced via GlobeNewswire. If Basis customers prefer to operate within their custom-built agents in Claude, ChatGPT or others, the MCP server gives those agents read/write access to numerous Basis features; supported capabilities encompass strategy, planning, campaign intelligence, activation and operations. Through Compass, users can also ask for DSP line items, groups and tactics to be created and third-party audiences and contextual segments to be added. The release names no MCP price and no per-action decision score.

Does the Basis MCP server score each activation before an agent commits spend? No scored decision is named. The release names a governance layer and, in the chief product officer's words, workflows, rules, permissions, and security built and tested in production for years — platform-level controls set in advance — and no per-action decision score, confidence threshold, per-activation approval step, or spend cap. In ScriptMasterLabs' live test on November 14, 2026, Basis-shaped actions on SML's own heuristic harness were held in every money form: DSP creation chose hold review at 0.9167 in bounded scope form and held at 0.50 advisory as a sentence; activation with a budget change held at 0.7857 scope and 0.7174 sentence.

What does ScriptMasterLabs Verdict Protocol cost? ScriptMasterLabs Verdict Protocol costs $0.25 USDC per decision and $0.01 USDC per seal on Base via x402, verified November 14, 2026 by a live 402 challenge quoting 250000 atomic USDC, payTo 0x5BBd32e0478e49A7540EF2D760E0B0F9AA6328b2. Its launch settlement (SELF-PROOF, October 12, 2026) settled at tx 0xfa3ec31ff345167a474c682cec4e2eac505cfdd570e158961a233187be5f6f1c, Base block 52522538. Basis named no MCP price in the launch release read.

How do you get the decision layer from ScriptMasterLabs? POST a decision capsule to https://verdict.scriptmasterlabs.com/decide ($0.25 USDC) for a 5-juror Verdict Protocol decision, and seal the receipt via /seal for $0.01 USDC; full pricing at https://scriptmasterlabs.com/verdict-protocol. The decision-gate pattern is at https://scriptmasterlabs.com/decision-gated-payments and the full ScriptMasterLabs catalog is at https://scriptmasterlabs.com/sml-products.

Canonical: https://scriptmasterlabs.com/basis-mcp-server · Related: https://scriptmasterlabs.com/verdict-protocol · https://scriptmasterlabs.com/decision-gated-payments · https://scriptmasterlabs.com/sml-products

Which primary sources does this piece rest on?

Related pieces

Build and sell MCP servers

More MCP server explainers

Free tool

Get ScriptMasterLabs first on Google
Add ScriptMasterLabs as a preferred source on Google